Jack, my friend, helped me to buy a iPad yesterday. I am lucky, I can expire iPad earlier than most people. In china, many peoples can't understand apple at all. In their minds, Apple products means expensive, looks good but terrible in use. In fact, they hadn't use any one apple product ever.
December, 2001, Apple releases iPod. It is "just" a mp3 player. But it is a milestone for mobile computing device. Many years ago, Apple had tried send computer to every home and every desks, but they had failed. Microsoft (the wintel) have accomplished this mission. Now, most desktop computers are running windows.
Nowadays, mobile computing is beginning. The change start from mobile device manufacturers. Several years ago, mobile phone such as Palm and Nokia is mainstream products in the market. Microsoft keep on optimize their mobile OS, which named winCE. Many people worried microsoft will control all market, just they have done on desktop pc. At that time, few people notice what Apple was doing. Apple had entered mobile device market with the music walkman. It is really a great point, the total unit-in-use of music walkman may greater than the mobile phone.
2007, Apple releases ipod touch, the war is over. Sony, Microsoft, Nokia... no one of them can make things better. YES, iTouch is not a perfect product , but there are many disadvantages of other.
As a developer, I have tried many mobile device, include Android. Unfortunately, iPhone/touch is still the best friendly product for the developer.
The usability of a product is nothing to do with it base on a close system or an open system. Android, although an open system, cannot offer much value to both developers or end-users. Apple platform is the best choice for both developers and end-users, recently.
Here is my opinion:
1 For end-users, Apple products have a smoothly experience, but Andorid just the reverse. (For example, there are too many keys on android mobile, It is a puzzle)
2 For end-users, they can get many high quality applications from appstore. Iphone apps are more valuable than android apps, both free apps or commerce apps.
3 For end-users, iphone's price is 30% higher than android mobile(nexus one or HTC hero). It's not important to user at all.
4 For the developer, They can build more apps for iPhone in the same time. For Android platform, the compatibility is a difficult problem, because there are too many different Android mobile types.
5 For the developer, appstore include the reseller, the payment agent... Apple takes only 30% of revenue, It's valuable. In the share software market, a payment agent will take 20% of revenue at least, then you must pay for download sites, advertising...
6 For the developer, Maybe Android will become the king of consumer electronics market. It's mean nothing to me. I don't want to work for a consumer electronics company. But I will build some funny apps for iPad, in my spare time.
7 For small business users, they don't care about close or open system. They don't care about the license price even. What they are concern is the quality of the app. A killer app can provide an important niche market for a platform. I have found many killer apps for iphone, but none for android. For example, A GPS navigator user don't known the map base on winCE or Android.
8 For big companies, Linux will give them more freedom than Android.
9 For everyone, It is not the right time to dive into Android now. Although Android may have a bright future.
I will develop something for iPad. I'm sure iPad will show its quality in education and multi-media market. IPad can be used in many places, replace desktop computers. It's an economic choice.
We have compare Android with apple, but poor symbian need not be compared. Nokia is far away from the mobile computing market.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Both are good in its own way.... So what we can say....??????
"Linux will give them more freedom than Android"
the correct way should be "Linux will give them more freedom than Android does"
Post a Comment